The Delhi High Court today pulled up the Centre for not sharing the details of missing children with the police despite its orders and warned of initiating contempt action if due seriousness was not shown in the 20-year-old matter.
The court said police officials were ultimately responsible for tracking down missing children and the more the Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD) delayed sharing access to its data base with the police, the greater would be the problem.
"There can be no legitimate reason for the MWCD to be sitting on the data of missing children and refusing to share it with police agencies in Delhi and elsewhere," a bench of justices S Muralidhar and I S Mehta said.
It said that a large number of missing children in the country are sought to be traced by the police on the complaints of anxious parents and the court was unable to appreciate why the ministry would want to frustrate implementation of its orders.
The court expressed displeasure when it was informed by the Delhi Police's special commissioner (crime) that it has obtained its own face recognition software (FRS) but it was unable to do trial run of the application as the MWCD has not provided the data.
It said the MWCD maintains the data of missing children, including their photographs, unique ID and the child welfare committee details, and without access to the details being given to the Delhi Police, the directions of the court to run the FRS on a test basis cannot be implemented.
When of a senior officer of the ministry, present in the court, said they were apprehensive of sharing the details with the police, the bench said the explanation was "objectionable" and "unacceptable".
"This public interest litigation (PIL) has been pending for over 20 years. The MWCD has to demonstrate to the court its seriousness about tracing missing children or else the court might be constrained to require the implementation of its orders under pain of contempt of court," the bench said.
Another senior officer of the MWCD said with the Delhi Police procuring the FRS, the MWCD would now be willing to share the data with it.
To this, the bench said, "The court finds this attitude of the MWCD, on deciding when it will implement the court's order and on what conditions, to be unacceptable. It was not for the MWCD to decide the conditions under which it would provide the Delhi Police access to the data it is holding. It was obliged and bound in law to ensure that this court's orders are not frustrated."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
