Justice C T Selvam of the Madurai bench said except for the alleged confession by an accused, there was no other material to prosecute the petitioners in the criminal case.
The accused had claimed that the petitioners were also partners of Ranjith Rathna Match Works where the blast took place on June 11,2013.
The judge said without sufficient material, police could not make the petitioners undergo the ordeal of facing trial.
The prosecution said the women were loading matchstick bags in a container box inside a van when a fire broke out, engulfing them.
Police had charged the owner and the manager with not providing sufficient protection and safety to the labourers.
The confession of one of the arrested led to the police including four more in the charge sheet and they prayed the court to quash the case on the ground that they had nothing to do with the management of the factory.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
