HC refuses bail to MCOCA accused in assault case

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Oct 13 2013 | 11:55 AM IST
The Bombay High Court has refused bail to an accused gangster held under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) for allegedly assaulting a rival gang member in Pune in 2011, along with 14 others, in a bid to extort money.
Justices P V Hardas and P N Deshmukh said on October 7 they were prima facie of the view that there was enough evidence against the accused, Pappu alias Atul Sonba Jogawade.
The Judges observed that in the light of material against the accused on record establishing his presence, armed with a stick to commit the assault along with co-accused and also because he prima facie appears to have shared a common object, they found no force in the submission that no overt act is attributed to the appellant by any of the witnesses.
According to the complainant, he was asked by Nilesh Gawade of whose gang Jogawade is a member, and his men to come to a particular place near a temple or else his house would be demolished.
When the complainant went to that place with his friends, he found Nilesh and his associates who attacked them with sticks and swords.
According to police, it was apparently a fight between two gangs.
The accused took the defence that he was armed with stick and injuries caused to the victim was those of swords and sharp-edged weapons allegedly used in the crime. Hence, it could not be said that he had assaulted the victim. Moreover, the bamboo stick was recovered at his instance from bushes.
However, the court held that the fact that the stick was recovered from the bushes at the instance of the accused showed that he had knowledge about this. The court also felt that this defence could be used by the accused in the trial and not at this stage to seek bail.
Counsel for the Petitioner J Shekar argued that no specific role had been attributed to the accused by any of the eye-witnesses, including the injured witnesses and as such even prima facie it cannot be said that any case is made out against his client.
The accused, along with 14 others, was chargesheeted under IPC, Arms Act, Bombay Police Act and MCOCA.
Earlier, the accused had withdrawn his bail petition in the high court in February this year.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 13 2013 | 11:55 AM IST

Next Story