Justices P V Hardas and P N Deshmukh said on October 7 they were prima facie of the view that there was enough evidence against the accused, Pappu alias Atul Sonba Jogawade.
The Judges observed that in the light of material against the accused on record establishing his presence, armed with a stick to commit the assault along with co-accused and also because he prima facie appears to have shared a common object, they found no force in the submission that no overt act is attributed to the appellant by any of the witnesses.
When the complainant went to that place with his friends, he found Nilesh and his associates who attacked them with sticks and swords.
According to police, it was apparently a fight between two gangs.
The accused took the defence that he was armed with stick and injuries caused to the victim was those of swords and sharp-edged weapons allegedly used in the crime. Hence, it could not be said that he had assaulted the victim. Moreover, the bamboo stick was recovered at his instance from bushes.
Counsel for the Petitioner J Shekar argued that no specific role had been attributed to the accused by any of the eye-witnesses, including the injured witnesses and as such even prima facie it cannot be said that any case is made out against his client.
The accused, along with 14 others, was chargesheeted under IPC, Arms Act, Bombay Police Act and MCOCA.
