HC refuses interim protection from arrest to Navlakha

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Nov 14 2019 | 5:35 PM IST

The Bombay High Court on Thursday refused to grant immediate protection from arrest to civil rights activist Gautam Navlakha, who has moved the court seeking anticipatory bail.

The court said it would consider on Friday the issue of granting interim relief to Navlakha by way of protection from arrest.

Justice P D Naik posted on Friday Navlakha's plea seeking anticipatory bail in the 2018 Koregaon Bhima violence case and for having alleged Maoist links.

Navlakha was given interim protection from arrest since August last year when he approached the high court seeking to quash the case lodged against him by Pune police.

In September this year, a division bench of the high court refused to quash the case, following which Navlakha approached the Supreme Court.

The apex court, while extending the interim protection till November 12, directed Navlakha to approach the concerned sessions court in Pune seeking pre-arrest bail.

On November 12, the Pune sessions court had rejected Navlakha's anticipatory bail plea and also refused to extend the protection granted to him by the apex court.

Navlakha then approached the high court on November 13.

His counsel Yug Chaudhary on Thursday told Justice Naik that the activist was given protection from arrest since last year and no harm would be caused to the probe if the same was extended till his anticipatory bail plea is heard by it.

"Navlakha's co-accused Anand Teltumbde has also filed a pre-arrest bail plea in the high court and has been given protection from arrest. Both their cases are identical," Chaudhary said.

Additional public prosecutor Aruna Kamat Pai, however, objected and said the relief granted to Teltumbde was extended by the Pune court.

"However, in this case, the sessions court has refused to extend the relief granted to Navlakha," Pai said.

The sessions court, while rejecting Navlakha's plea, had taken note of various documents submitted by the prosecution to show that he was an active member of the banned CPI (Maoist) group.

Apart from Navlakha and Teltumbde, several other activists have been booked for their alleged Maoist links and several other charges following the violence at Koregaon Bhima village in Pune district on January 1 last year.

According to Pune Police, "inflammatory" speeches and "provocative" statements made at the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017 had triggered caste violence at Koregaon Bhima the next day. The police alleged that the conclave was backed by Maoists.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 14 2019 | 5:35 PM IST

Next Story