The court said enough of protection has already been granted in the matter following a high court order that no coercive steps should be taken.
The high court was hearing a plea of the Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) seeking a stay on the probe on the ground that the Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) of the Delhi government had recently issued summons to its three senior officials even though the agency did not do anything since 2015.
On the issue of ACB's jurisdiction to probe such matters, Justice A K Chawla said it was being heard by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court and it would be appropriate to hear this case after the apex court's decision as it would have a bearing on it.
"We can wait for some time. The orders to protect your interest are already there. No coercive steps are to be taken is already said in the earlier order," the high court said.
During the hearing, the senior counsel referred to the August 4, 2016 judgement of a division bench of the high court which had held that the powers of the ACB were limited to probing graft cases in various departments under the administrative authority of the Lieutenant Governor (LG) but not extending to central government employees.
The Delhi government, in its reply filed through its standing counsel Ramesh Singh, opposed the stay application saying the high court had earlier granted them relief that no coercive step would be taken by the ACB. Besides, pressing for the same prayer would be an abuse of the legal process.
The ACB had issued summons to three RIL officials in September and November asking them to join the investigation.
Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal had earlier asked the ACB to lodge an FIR in the matter.
The FIR was lodged by the ACB on a complaint sent to the chief minister by former cabinet secretary T S R Subramanian, former secretary E A S Sarma, former navy chief R H Tahiliani and advocate Kamini Jaiswal.
The FIR was lodged under sections for cheating and criminal conspiracy of the IPC and under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act. All the accused have denied the allegations.
The complaint had alleged that the impact of gas price rise would cost the country a minimum of Rs 54,500 crore per year at the dollar price then.
RIL had earlier told the high court that an FIR against it in the matter should be quashed as the AAP government was "never entitled" to lodge an FIR against it.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
