A division bench of the court, comprising Justices Imtiyaz Murtaza and Devendra Kumar Upadhaya, was hearing the PIL filed by NGO 'Hindu Front for Justice' through its seven associate members who are practising advocates of the high court.
The petitioner sought a direction to quash the DMs' orders passed under Section 144 of CrPC for maintaining peace and tranquillity.
Petitioners' counsel Hari Shankar Jain argued that under article 25 of the Constitution, every citizen has the right to practice and propagate his religion.
They said the orders under Section 144 were violative of fundamental rights of free religious practice of devotees, and the orders imposed on August 18 and thereafter in view of Vishwa Hindu Parishad's 84 kosi parikrama are liable to be quashed.
The PIL was opposed by the state government, with additional government advocate Madhulika Yadav saying the orders of the DMs were completely valid as they had received information from various sources that peace may be disturbed on account of the yatra.
