HC reserves orders in Maran-SpiceJet case

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Mar 09 2018 | 9:50 PM IST
The Madras High Court today reserved its orders on a petition filed by Kalanithi Maran, challenging the Income Tax department's order declaring him as the principal officer of low-cost carrier SpiceJet and making him liable for the alleged tax dues of the company when it was owned by him.
Justice M Duraiswamy reserved the orders after hearing the arguments of the additional solicitor general (ASG) and Maran's counsel.
When the matter came up for hearing, senior counsel P S Raman, appearing for Maran, submitted that the petitioner had not received any salary from the company.
The counsel submitted that Maran was the non-executive chairman of the company and was not involved in its day-to-day affairs.
The managing director of SpiceJet had already given a letter to the IT department to this effect, Raman said, adding that not even a rupee was due to the department.
ASG G Rajagopalan, who appeared on behalf of the IT department, contended that the Madras High Court had no jurisdiction to hear the matter as the complaint was filed in Delhi.
The petitioner had already filed a petition, seeking quashing of the proceedings, and obtained a stay order from the Delhi High Court, the ASG submitted.
He further submitted that as per the company's own annual statements for 2012 and 2013, the petitioner was the holder of 52 per cent shares in SpiceJet.
The registered office of the company was shifted to the "Murasoli Maran Towers" during the petitioner's tenure as its chairman and as per the statement of the firm in its annual report, the petitioner was the main decision-making authority, the ASG submitted and added that therefore, Maran could not say that he was not the principal officer.
The ASG further argued that whether Maran was a principal officer or not was a question of fact, "which has to be agitated before the criminal court. Hence, this court cannot go into it".
After the completion of the arguments, the judge reserved his orders.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 09 2018 | 9:50 PM IST

Next Story