HC ruling on Homestay scheme

Image
Press Trust of India Madurai
Last Updated : Mar 24 2014 | 11:45 PM IST

Don't want to miss the best from Business Standard?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has ruled that one person should reside physically in a flat and host guests there to avail benefits under the Bed and Breakfast Scheme promoted by the state Tourism Department.
As per the guidelines, the classification for Incredible India Bed and Breakfast/Homestay establishment will be given only in those cases where the owner/promoter of the setup, along with his/her family, is physically residing in the same establishment and letting out minimum one room and maximum six rooms, a Division Bench of Justice V Ramasubramanian and Justice V M Velumani said.
The bench was allowing an appeal filed by T V Andal, a resident of Thathachariar Gardens (block of flats) at Srirangam in Tiruchirappalli district.
In this case the owner of five apartments could not claim that he was residing physically in five apartments with his family. One person could reside physically only in one apartment, the bench said.
The Tamil Nadu Tourism Department should not have granted permission on non-satisfaction of this condition.
Under the Tamil Nadu Public Buildings (licencing) Act, if a person "lets out his entire apartment for the purpose of accommodating somebody and also for providing breakfast, the premises would come within the meaning of the expression "public building". Such a building required licence under Sec 3 of the act, the bench said.
"If an apartment owner allows guests to stay in one room and also provides lunch or dinner, the same may not strictly come within the purview of the expression public buildings."
The Appellant submitted that the Tourism Department on her earlier petition had cancelled the licence of Kamaraj who owned five apartments and had allowed the tourists to stay under the scheme without himself staying.
Kamaraj had challenged this and the court had allowed his writ plea observing that the department should have heard his view before cancelling the licence. The appellant filed the plea following this, stating as per rules Kamaraj should stay in the apartment for getting licence under the scheme.
The judges said Kamaraj could apply for using only one of his apartment under the scheme, and the Tourism Department could grant licence provided all guidelines were met.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 24 2014 | 11:45 PM IST

Next Story