"File your (Delhi government) response if any," a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal said while posting the matter for hearing to March 21.
The court, which in November last year had said that it will pass its order on the pleas, has now fixed the matter in March on the ground that it will take up the issue along with two similar petitions pending before it for consideration.
The Delhi government had defended its decision to award Rs one crore to the family of Grewal, saying it was a "policy matter" which has to go to the Lieutenant Governor (LG) for approval.
The plea by advocate Avadh Kaushik, who has also opposed the government's decision to declare Grewal as 'martyr', has said Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal should not "glorify" the "act of suicide".
Another petitioner Puran Chand Arya, through his counsel Abhishek Choudhary, has sought a direction to restrain the government from going ahead with the decision till the court pronounced its order.
One out of the two petitions which will also come up for hearing on March 21 has challenged the city government's decision to declare as a "martyr" a Rajasthan-based- politician-cum- farmer Gajendra Singh Kalyanwat who had allegedly hanged himself at an AAP rally at Jantar Mantar on April 22, 2015.
The incident had occurred during an anti-land bill rally called by Aam Aadmi Party.
The pleas, which came up for hearing today, have claimed that the AAP government has decided to give 'martyr' status to Grewal and it should not award compensation like this as it was taxpayers' money.
Advocate Kaushik, who had on two earlier occasions challenged similar decisions of the Delhi government granting compensation and government job to kin of individuals who had committed suicide, told the bench that this was the third time when the government has taken such a decision.
In his plea, he alleged that by granting compensation and a job to kin of the ex-serviceman, the Kejriwal government has "glorified, justified, supported, propagated and consecrated the act of suicide".
He has sought directions from the court to quash or set aside the decision saying it amounts to "misappropriation of public funds".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
