The Delhi High Court today sought response of the Centre, AAP government and the Assembly on a plea by BJP MLAs against a resolution passed in the House to place before it a status report on the files which have been "delayed or blocked" by the Lieutenant Governor's office.
Justice Rajiv Shakdher, while issuing notice to the Centre, AAP government and the Assembly, asked the BJP MLAs, who filed the petition, whether the court can intercede in the running of the House.
The court listed the matter for further hearing on October 8.
Senior advocate Sanjay Jain, appearing for BJP MLAs Vijender Gupta, Om Prakash Sharma, Jagdish Pradhan and Manjinder Singh Sirsa, said the Speaker of the House should not have allowed the resolution to be moved, discussed or acted upon nor should he have asked for an outcome report.
Jain said that the outcome report indicated the projects which could not be completed due to the so called "obstacles" created by the Lieutenant Governor (LG).
He said that the entire process starting from moving of the resolution and which culminated in the outcome report was in conflict with the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) Act and the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Assembly.
The petition, filed through advocate Sahaj Garg, has also challenged the outcome report of the LG's office prepared by the Delhi government.
On March 26, the Delhi Assembly passed a resolution, moved by AAP MLA Sourabh Bharadwaj, directing the AAP government to present a "status report" on files which have been "delayed or blocked" by the office of Lieutenant Governor Anil Baijal.
The plea has also sought direction to the "Speaker of the Delhi Assembly not to allow the proceeding to the extent which reflects the conduct of the LG as distinct from the government".
The plea has claimed that "such resolution is also in violation of Rule 264 (f) of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi. It clearly states that a member while speaking shall not reflect upon the conduct of any governor."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
