HC seeks Delhi govt reply on journalist's plea in defamation case

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 22 2018 | 9:25 PM IST

The Delhi High Court today sought the response of the Delhi government and a former BJP councillor on a plea by a TV journalist challenging the proceedings against him in a criminal defamation case for allegedly airing libellous news.

Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva issued a notice to the complainant, who had filed the defamation case against Rajdeep Sardesai, who was then heading the IBN18 Network, and listed the matter for hearing on September 19.

The court also granted journalist exemption from personal appearance before a Dwarka trial court for a hearing in June.

Advocates Saif Mahmood and Mrinal Bharti, who appeared for Sardesai, sought quashing of the January 8 order of a sessions court which had set aside a previous decision of a magistrate discharging him in the defamation case.

The counsel sought the high court's direction to reaffirm the magistrate's December 2013 order by which the journalist was discharged in the case on the ground that no offence was made out against him.

They also said if the sessions court's order was not stayed, it would cause unnecessary harassment to the journalist.

The defamation complaint was filed in the trial court in December 2011 against six persons, including Sardesai, following allegations that they defamed the complainant Ajit Kumar Tokas by initiating a sting operation in which reporters posed as builders with hidden cameras intended to and hereby allegedly exposing illegal construction in municipal ward Munirka of which Tokas was the then BJP councillor.

It claimed that the reporters posed as builders approached the complainant with hidden cameras to allegedly expose and trap him who they assumed was corrupt and involved in such irregularities.

It alleged that the sting was carried by an agency named 'Cobrapost', which worked for channels such as CNN-IBN and IBN-7. The sting operation was telecast from December 6, 2011 to December 8, 2011.

It said not only this news was broadcast through their channels, it was also disseminated through their website.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 22 2018 | 9:25 PM IST

Next Story