Justice S.Nagamuthu of the Madurai bench, allowing the appeal filed by Jayasankar and Nagamuthu, cited material contradictions in the evidence produced by prosecution.
"There is a legal presumption against the accused that they should have committed the crime. It is a gangrape case in which a juvenile was also involved and tried separately before the Juvenile Justice Board."
"..Such a presumption is undoubtedly rebuttable.But the court finds it difficult even to raise such a presumption in this case due to contradictions and improbabilities in the evidence of the victim and her parents," the judge said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
