Land Revenue Commissioner T O Sooraj had in a September 4, 2012 order cancelled mutation of property in the name of N A Shariffa and others who were the original owners of 98 cents of land in Thrikkakara north village.
Allowing the petition, Justice A V Ramakrishna Pillai observed that the Land Revenue Commissioner cancelling mutation of the land owned by Shariffa and others has no legal force.
The Court quashed the proceedings and consequential order of the Land Revenue Commissioner and received land tax from the landowner.
Allegations had been levelled against Sooraj that he had cleared revenue procedures to help the accused, who are reported to be his relatives, to help them grab land worth Rs 25 crore at Pathadipalam near Kalamassery.
Sooraj has denied all charges and said that he had acted based on reports from other officials.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
