HC sets aside order removing Stalin's PA

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Nov 23 2016 | 10:48 PM IST
The Madras High Court today set aside an order of the Assembly Secretary removing a Deputy Secretary-level officer who was appointed as Special Personal Assistant of DMK Treasurer and leader of the Opposition M K Stalin.
Stalin had challenged the order. He had submitted that the Leader of Opposition was entitled to have a Personal Assistant, a post created vide a December 12, 1970 Government Order (GO), and extended from time to time.
As per the GO, the appointing authority is the Secretary of the Assembly and the choice of the candidate for the post is made by the Leader of Opposition.
Accordingly, after Stalin became the Leader of Opposition earlier this year, Athiseshan was appointed as his Special Personal Assistant by upgrading the post vide an order dated August 8.
Against the backdrop of the en-masse suspension of DMK MLAs, including himself, on August 22 for a week, the Assembly Secretary had repatriated Athiseshan back to his parent department by downgrading the upgraded post.
Stalin's counsel had then submitted that the Assembly Secretary's order was "illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and tainted with mala fide".
P Wilson, counsel for Stalin, today said the personal assistant could continue in office till the termination of his or her services by the leader of opposition, or after he or she vacated his or her office, counsel said.
Justice R Subbaiah highlighted the previous verdicts of the Supreme Court which had established that a person appointed on deputation in a tenure post for a fixed period had no right to go back to his original post before the fixed term comes to an end.
Similarly, a person appointed so, has an indefeasible right to be treated fairly and equally. If such a person is appointed on deputation, the same cannot be cancelled without the consent of the person before whom that person is presently serving on deputation, the court said.
If the deputation is not a simple transfer and if the appointment is a tenure posting, the same cannot be curtailed.
After counsel requested to fix timeframe to implement this order, the judge directed the Assembly Secretary to place Athisheshan in terms of the original order posting him as special PA, at the earliest.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 23 2016 | 10:48 PM IST

Next Story