Justice MS Ramesh, before whom the case came up, said in view of the fact that the issue has now been referred back to this court from the Supreme Court, "the investigation in crime no. 143 of 2016 ... is required to be quashed, since all the claimants have given their consent through affidavits."
The petitioner has also verified these affidavits and affirms them to be genuine. Incidentally, it was the intention of the apex court to have the FIR quashed to enable the claimants to receive their respective claims after due adjudication, the judge said.
The judge then posted the matter for recording the report of the Court Commissioner to November 30.
The matter relates to complaints filed with police by parents of medical aspirants alleging that they paid huge amounts running into crores of rupees to secure medical seats in the SRM Medical College in 2016.
The court had appointed former Chief Justice of Jammu and Kashmir High Court N Paul Vasanthakumar as Commmissioner to disburse money to 136 claimants against which Pachamuthu filed a Special Leave petition in the apex court.
The money was paid allegedly to Pachamuthu through Madhan by 136 aspirants seeking medical seats. However, the seats were not given as promised and Madhan had absconded leaving behind a suicide note. He was later traced and arrested.
Pachamuthu was also arrested in the case and later released on bail after he deposited Rs 75 crore and furnished Rs 10 crore bank guarantee in the trial court.
When the matter came up, senior counsel for Pachamuthu submitted that in compliance with the apex court directive, the 136 claimants as well as five additional claimants have served copies of affidavits on the petitioner stating that they have no objection in having the FIR quashed, provided their claims are settled.
The judge while referring to the report of Justice N. Paul Vasanthakumar said "...it is seen that 125 claimants out of 136 were prima facie admitted for disbursement. Among the remaining 11 claimants, 7 claimants have been referred to this court and four of the claimants could not be verified as they pertained to admission for Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Puducherry and not SRM College."
As the seven claimants, who were referred by the Commissioner to the court, represented that they were in possession of few more details, they deserve "reconsideration in my view".
The judge allowed the 11 claimants to approach the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central Crime Branch-II, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai, for the purpose of further investigation into the alleged payments made for procuring seats in SRM College.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
