A division bench, comprising Justices R.Sudhakar and V M Velumani, passed the interim order on a PIL which sought to restore the disciplinary proceedings against the advocates to Karnataka State Bar Council, as originally proposed by BCI.
The court directed the Secretary of the Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry (BCTP), who constituted the SDC, the Chairman of the BCI and the SDC to give their views on the plea in the PIL.
Initially, the BCI constituted a disciplinary committee consisting of members from the Karnataka Bar Council so that a fair and proper inquiry could be conducted. But following a "sly" request from the BCTP, the BCI transferred the inquiry to the state body.
The petitioner claimed that of the three members nominated to the committee, Ranganathan and Varathan were close friends of two of the suspended lawyers M Thirunavukarasu and Nedunchzhian. Varathan was meeting the delinquent lawyers at a lodge in Chennai, he alleged.
He urged the court to stay the proceedings by the SDC constituted by the BCTP and quash the order setting up the committe.
Further, the BCI Chairman should be directed to restore the original order directing the Karnataka state Bar Council to conduct the inquiry, he submitted.
