Tata Camelot Housing Project spread on 52.66 acres of land near the Chandigarh Capitol Complex featured 19 towers ranging between 7 and 28 storeys.
The project was proposed to be carried on the land which was originally alloted to the 'Punjab MLA Society' for construction of residential houses of MLAs of Punjab Legislature.
Subsequently, the land was sold to Hash Builders Private Limited with an understanding that each member of the 'Punjab MLA Society' would be allotted one flat each.
It said the map of Survey of India demarcating boundaries of the catchment area of the Sukhna Lake is binding on the Punjab government.
"In turn, Tata Housing Development Company Ltd (HDCL) is also bound by the same. The area over which the project in question is proposed to be constructed by Tata HDCL forms part of the catchment area of Sukhna Lake as demarcated in the Survey of India map dated September 21, 2004," the bench noted.
The Supreme Court had earlier stayed the ambitious housing project which was given clearance by the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
Later, the apex court had transferred the plea to the Delhi High Court.
The project falls in the catchment area of the Sukhna Lake.
The bench said the permission for the project, granted by the gram panchayat of Sukhna catchment area village, is set aside.
"The Environmental Clearance dated September 17, 2013 granted by State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) Punjab for development of the project proposed by Tata HDCL is not in conformity with notification dated September 14, 2006 of MoEF and therefore, the same shall stand set aside," the bench said.
It further said that if re-consideration by the Punjab government as directed by the court is in favour of Tata, then the company may apply to the Centre for environmental clearance treating the project as a category 'A' project, which falls within 10 km of a protected wildlife sanctuary.
The PIL had raised issue of permissibility of the project alleging that it was in violation of the Punjab New Capital Periphery Control Act.
It had also alleged the project falls within the catchment area of the Sukhna Lake and was in close proximity of wildlife sanctuary, declared a reserved forest area.
The PIL had said if the land and its surrounding areas are allowed to be urbanised, "it will result in the degradation of the habitat and disturb thousands of migratory birds which come every year to the lake".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
