HC upholds dismissal of CISF constable

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jul 04 2014 | 10:56 PM IST
The Madras High Court has upheld the dismissal of a Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) constable on the charge of sexually harassing a minor daughter of one of his colleagues, saying being a member of such a force he should maintain higher degree of morality.
A division bench, comprising Justice N.Paul Vasanthakumar and Justice M.Sathyanarayanan, endorsed the dismissal order passed by the Director General of CISF and dismissed the petition by constable B M Sanjeeva challenging the action.
"The petitioner, being a member of the disciplined force, should maintain higher degree of morality and the action of the petitioner in misbehaving with a 11-year old cannot be treated as flimsy charge for imposing lenient punishment," it held.
Sanjeeva, who joined CISF in May 1999 as a constable, was issued a charge memo in June 2009 for allegedly teasing the girl when she and her brother were waiting in the staircase of the CSIF quarters.
In his written reply to the memo, Sanjeeva denied the allegation and submitted he only touched the cheeks of both children and did not misbehave with them.
The CISF Disciplinary Authority, not satisfied with the reply, had imposed the punishment of reduction of scale of pay for a period of five years and a freeze on increments during the period.
Aggrieved, Sanjeeva approached the appellate authority which held the punishment was not proportionate to the gravity of charge and enhanced it by dismissing him from service.
The constable moved the high court with a prayer to set aside the dismissal order and reinstatement with all monetary and consequential benefits.
The counsel for the petitioner argued that since the allegation was of sexual harassment, the Disciplinary Authority have no jurisdiction to inquire the same and and it should have been done by the Complaints Committee.
Dismissing the petition, the bench said "none of the grounds raised by the petitioner is found to be accepted by this court. There is no illegality in the order passed by the Appellate Authority in enhancing the punishment to dismissal.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 04 2014 | 10:56 PM IST

Next Story