HC wants TN govt to consider reservation for forward community

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Dec 15 2017 | 6:15 PM IST
The Madras High Court has directed the state government to explore the possibility of extending the scope of reservation in higher education and public employment for persons from the forward community based on their economic status.
The court made the observation on a plea moved by 14 students from the forward community (FC).
The petition sought a direction to declare transfer of MBBS seats in government medical colleges meant for open category to BC and MBC categories as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
When the plea came up yesterday, Justice Kirubakaran said: "The poor, in the so-called forward communities, have been neglected, so far and no one could speak about them fearing protest voices in the name of social justice."
Social justice should be extended to every section of the society, the judge said.
"The necessity of having reservation for economic and social empowerment of those sections of the society, (BC, MBC, SC & ST) which have been hitherto neglected and oppressed is a must," justice Kirubakaran said.
At the same time, the judge said, talking about reservation or extending help to the deserving poor in forward communities should not be viewed or considered an opposition to the reservation enjoyed by other sections of the society.
"Further, this court is aware that in all the communities, there are poor people and they should be encouraged to develop educationally, economically and socially," the judge said.
The court directed the state government to provide details as to how many communities remain as FC in the state, how many falls under Backward Class (BC), Most Backward Class (MBC), Scheduled castes and Scheduled Tribes (SC&ST).
It also wanted the government to verify whether reservation benefits have reached the said communities from 1950 onwards.
The court directed the government to inform as to whether it is possible to make reservation for the people belonging to the FC based on their economic status.
Referring to fake community certificates for the purpose of getting reservation benefits, the court wanted to know what steps government was taking to prevent issue of such certificates.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 15 2017 | 6:15 PM IST

Next Story