HC warns contempt action against lawyers who go on strike

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Nov 02 2014 | 11:50 AM IST
The Bombay High Court has warned lawyers against going on strike or indulging in any misconduct which disturbs the administration of justice, saying it would take suitable action against them under Contempt of Court Act.
The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, with whom the advocates are registered, are also free to take action against such lawyers, a bench headed by Chief Justice Mohit Shah said.
Contempt action would be taken against individual lawyers or those resorting to misconduct in groups, said the bench in an order issued three days ago.
The HC was hearing a PIL filed by advocate Manoj Laxman Shirsatthe contending that the strike observed on calls given by the District Bar Associations on August 29, 2013 and by the Bar Council of India on March 11, 2013 for a countrywide protest on varying issues, were illegal.
"The law with reference to the advocates going on strike is now well settled. It is the duty of every advocate who has accepted a brief to attend trial even though it may go on day-to-day and for a prolonged period. He cannot refuse to attend court merely because a boycott call and/or to go on strike is given by the Bar Association," the bench observed.
"It is unprofessional as well as unbecoming for a advocate to refuse to attend court even in pursuance of a call for strike or a boycott by the Bar Association or the Bar Council. These views have also been endorsed by the Supreme Court in its judgements." the Judges remarked.
The petitioner prayed for a direction to the Bar Council of India and Bar council of Maharashtra and Goa not to pass any resolution giving a call for strike in future.
He also prayed for a direction that the Managing Committee of the Bar Councils be directed to pay in personal capacity appropriate compensation as penalty for disturbing administration of justice.
The counsel for the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa Rajendra Raghuvanshi informed the court that the Council had recently passed a resolution saying that it shall call upon and persuade all the Bar Associations in the two states not to participate in any illegal strike.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 02 2014 | 11:50 AM IST

Next Story