Heart failure survival rates not improved since 1998: study

Image
Press Trust of India London
Last Updated : Jan 31 2017 | 5:49 PM IST
Survival rates for people suffering from heart failure have not improved since 1998, according to a first-of-its-kind study.
Researchers from University of Oxford and University of Birmingham in the UK looked at medical records from 54,313 patients with heart failure.
They found that 81.3 per cent survived for one year, 51.5 per cent survived for two years, and 29.5 per cent survived for 10 years, following diagnosis with the condition.
However, between 1998 and 2012, survival rates for people aged over 45 with heart failure showed no improvement, in contrast to cancer survival rates in the UK which have doubled in the last 40 years.
Heart failure is a common long-term condition affecting around 900,000 in the UK. An estimated one to two in every 100 adults in the West currently live with the condition.
"Getting an accurate estimate of heart failure prognosis is vital for those who commission healthcare services, so resources can be allocated appropriately," said lead author Clare Taylor, researcher at the University of Oxford.
"Perhaps more importantly, this allows patients to make more informed choices about treatments and possible end-of-life care," said Taylor.
"While the survival rates were better than other studies, we disappointingly didn't see any improvement over time," she said.
"We plan to do more work to examine why this might be the case and find ways to improve the outlook for patients with heart failure in the future," Taylor said.
This is the first study to provide survival rate estimates for heart failure in the UK based on medical records.
While the study did not look at the effect of medication following heart failure on survival rates, it found that survival rate estimates vary depending on a person's age, gender, other health conditions and blood pressure - all factors that healthcare professionals should take into consideration when discussing heart failure with their patients.
The study was published in the journal Family Practice.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 31 2017 | 5:49 PM IST

Next Story