Heinous crime should be treated as crime against society: Bombay High Court

A division bench of justices N H Patil and P D Naik refused to quash a case lodged against 12 people on charges of attempt to murder

Bombay High Court. Photo: Wikipedia
Bombay High Court. Photo: Wikipedia
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Aug 27 2016 | 5:39 PM IST
Crime of 'serious nature' should be treated as crime against the society and not an individual and such a case cannot be quashed even if the offender and victims reach an amicable settlement, the Bombay High Court has said.

A division bench of justices N H Patil and P D Naik on August 25 refused to quash a case lodged against 12 people on charges of attempt to murder and various other sections of the IPC.

The accused had petitioned the high court seeking to quash the FIR lodged against them on the ground that they have amicably settled the dispute with the complainants.

The high court, however, refused to accept this contention and said, "The accused have committed crime against the society."

The bench noted that if the crime committed by the accused is 'heinous' and of a 'serious nature' then it should be treated as a crime against the society and not against an individual alone.

"It becomes the duty of the State to punish the crime doers even if there is a settlement/compromise between the perpetrators of the crime and the victim," the court said, dismissing the accused persons' petition.

A case was registered in July by Zia-ul-Haq Nijamuddin Ansari and Shahanawaz Khan against the 12 people for attempt to murder and various other charges under the Indian Penal Code at suburban Kurla police station.

According to the complaint, on July 5, the complainant and his brother were assaulted by the accused after they refused to sell spare parts in their shop at a lesser price as demanded by the accused persons.

In the scuffle, the accused persons allegedly poured hot oil from a snack shop nearby over the complainant due to which he suffered severe burn injuries all over his body. When passersby intervened, the accused ran away.

An FIR was lodged following which all the accused persons were arrested.

However, later, the complainant and his brother sent a letter to the police claiming that the whole incident was an accident and that they do not want to pursue the case.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 27 2016 | 4:57 PM IST

Next Story