Human, technical errors to blame for Afghan hospital strike

Image
AFP Kabul
Last Updated : Nov 25 2015 | 3:22 PM IST
US forces who launched an air strike on an Afghan hospital last month intended to attack a nearby Taliban-controlled compound, military officials told American media, citing an investigation set to blame human and technical error for the deadly strike.
The October 3 air raid on a Doctors Without Borders (MSF) hospital in the Taliban-held northern city of Kunduz killed at least 30 people, sparked an avalanche of global condemnation and forced the French charity to close the hospital.
Two military officials told the New York Times yesterday that a combination of human and technical errors meant that a Special Operations AC-130 gunship aircraft hit the hospital instead of an Afghan intelligence compound hundreds of feet away that was thought to have been commandeered by Taliban fighters.
The gunship's crew relied on location information relayed to them by US and Afghan special forces rather than their aircraft's instruments, according to the officials, who discussed the report on condition of anonymity ahead of its formal release.
The findings will be officially announced by US General John Campbell at NATO headquarters in Kabul at 7.00 pm today (1430 GMT).
The officials' account as quoted by the NYT does not address why the attack - which lasted more than one hour - was not halted despite frantic telephone calls from MSF staff, nor why US ground forces failed to intervene when they saw the wrong building being hit.
One official told the Times the crew did not receive a full preflight briefing that would have told them the Kunduz hospital was protected under the Geneva Convention.
The US military also failed to follow its own rules of engagement for calling air strikes - that American or Afghan troops must be in extreme danger - while the Special Operations Forces did not positively identify that the area targeted was legitimate, the paper said.
"There was certainly some confusion over what they were shooting at," an official told the Wall Street Journal, which received a similar briefing. "If there wasn't, then this wouldn't have happened."
The US military offered a series of shifting explanations for the bombing raid before President Barack Obama admitted in a call to MSF chief Joanne Liu that the strike was a mistake and apologised.
A NATO statement released hours after the attack on Saturday, October 3 would not confirm the hospital was targeted, characterising it instead as "collateral damage" as Afghan forces came under fire.
The next day the US confirmed the hospital was hit directly, but did not offer further details.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 25 2015 | 3:22 PM IST

Next Story