"We are in recovery. That's broadly what we said before and by and large, we would stick to that. There is volatility in this recovery process. So, it's not a strong (and) sustained recovery where all the signals are exactly in the same direction," he said.
Rajan made the statement after the RBI board meeting, which was addressed by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley.
Also Read
The growth is "not as strong as we would like as a country... We have to see how it progresses".
The industrial output for the third month in a row remained in the negative territory, contracting 1.5% in January due to poor showing of manufacturing and capital goods sector.
The declining industrial output prompted India Inc to press for a rate cut by RBI, which is scheduled to announce its monetary policy on April 5.
On whether RBI would take into account the government's resolve to stick to the fiscal consolidation path and ease the monetary policy to boost growth, Rajan said the headline number of 3.5% fiscal deficit target is a firm indication of government's intent for fiscal consolidation.
"Both the markets and RBI are comforted by that. How that feeds into monetary policy is... You have to wait and watch. I have said before that it is contingent... I don't comment on the direction of monetary policy before the policy date or whatever dates we take action. We explain our actions at that time."
Jaitley decided to keep the fiscal deficit target at 3.5% of GDP for 2016-17, overlooking the suggestion for greater public spending to boost growth.
Fielding questions on fiscal deficit, Rajan said the government could explore the possibility of moving to a cyclically-adjusted fiscal deficit target.
"There are ideas that have been floated, for example, moving to a cyclically-adjusted fiscal deficit rather than a fiscal deficit that does not take into account ground condition. This is something that a number of countries also do. My guess is that all these issues will also be explored by the commission that is looking at this," the governor said.
The government has decided to set up a committee to review the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act and look into the feasibility of setting a range for fiscal deficit targets rather than a fixed figure.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)