The Indian Medical Association (IMA) today sought clear-cut guidelines from the Medical Council of India (MCI) on the issue of telemedication, while observing that the practice is illegal and unethical.
Apart from managing medical emergencies and situations involving adjustment of insulin levels in regular patients, analgesics for acute exacerbation of chronic pain under regular treatment etc., telephonic consultation will lead to medical negligence, the IMA said in a statement released today.
"Judicious use of telemedication in certain circumstances can be justified, but as the code of ethics is silent on these emerging areas, judicial over activism can prove to be detrimental to this noble profession.
"Online consultations, online prescriptions and telemedicine are all topics which have posed ethical dilemmas. But at the same time, advancing technology can be harnessed for augmenting healthcare in remote areas, especially telemedicine and mobile health. The MCI must come out with clear-cut guidelines on these important issues, which many developed countries have," Dr Ravi Wankhedkar, National President of the IMA said.
Following a high court verdict to proceed with criminal prosecution in an incident which involved telephonic consultation, the issue came to the attention of the public and was widely discussed.
Although the particular stand by the high court was not to find negligence in the telephonic consultation but for other reasons. Subsequently the arrest of the doctors in the case was stayed by the Supreme Court, the IMA said in the statement.
In this situation, judicial law comes into force and thereby the Bombay High Court verdict gains importance.
Secretary General of IMA, Dr R N Tandon, said the common practice involved in treating a patient was eliciting history, physical examination, going through investigations and arriving at a diagnosis. Treatment was instituted after the diagnosis, he added.
"In telephonic consultations, all or part of the above may not be undertaken. Hence there is always a possibility of alleging and finding negligence on the part of the doctor by the legal fora," Tandon said.
A history of the ailment, clinical examination is needed to prescribe any medication. And ethically, a doctor can only prescribe medicine or advice on treatment upon physically seeing a patient and hence, telephonic consultations without seeing the patient is unethical and legally invalid, he said.
A regular patient, seeking consultation over the phone, maybe due to change in symptoms or signs, need to be examined physically before altering medication to avoid negligence, Tandon added.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
