The US industry and trade lobbies are putting pressure on their government to put India under this list, sources said.
Officials here said the demand is "completely wrong" as India's intellectual property rights are complaint with global laws, including the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
Under the US Trade Act, a Priority Foreign Country is the worst classification given to those which deny adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) or fair and equitable market access to the US persons relying on IPR protection.
"If the US does that, then India probably will have no option but drag them to the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism," an official said.
The US International Trade Commission (USITC), a quasi- judicial federal American agency, has already initiated an investigation against India's trade and investment policies.
It has alleged that New Delhi's laws discriminate against the US companies.
"The country's IPR (intellectual property rights) laws are fully compliant with WTO. If America has any issue with our laws, they can raise that in the WTO," the official said.
To follow up the probe, USITC officials have sought a meeting with Indian officials. However, the government has rejected the request.
The Obama administration had been strongly criticising India's investment climate and IPR laws, especially in the pharmaceuticals and solar sectors.
The USITC wanted to meet Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia, 15 secretaries and 6-7 joint secretary level officers from ministries including DIPP, Animal Husbandry, Health, Telecommunication, Commerce and Health.
American pharma companies had objected India's move to issue a compulsory license (CL) in March, 2012 to Hyderabad- based Natco Pharma to manufacture and sell cancer-treatment drug 'Nexavar' at a price over 30 times lower than charged by patent-holder Bayer Corporation.
Swiss pharma major Novartis AG had lost a legal battle for getting its blood cancer drug Gleevec patented in India and to restrain Indian companies from manufacturing generic drugs. The Supreme Court had rejected the multinational company's plea last year.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
