India missed a fifth bowler in drawn 3rd Test,

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 20 2017 | 10:28 PM IST
Legendary Sunil Gavaskar feels India missed a fifth bowler in the third and penultimate cricket Test against Australia which ended in a tame draw, here today.
Gavaskar was of the opinion that with Wriddhiman Saha, Ravichandra Saha and Ravindra Jadeja in good nick, India can afford to bring in a fifth bowler in the playing eleven to share the burden of its four-men bowling attack.
"India's batting has benefited by the fact that you have somebody like (Ravichandran) Ashwin, somebody like a Wriddhiman Saha at No 6, 7 and 8. And if Jadeja can come score runs as he has done in this series then I think it really makes sense to go back to five bowlers and six batsmen theory," Gavaskar told NDTV.
"Today clearly India missed a fifth bowler. I am not saying a fifth bowler would have ripped through the opposition but he would have given just that little bit of break to our hard working fast bowlers. Both Umesh (Yadav) and Ishant (Sharma) bowled their hearts out," he said.
The former India captain also differed with Australia captain Steve Smith and said it is not the visitors but India who has the momentum on its side going into the fourth and final Test in Dharamsala starting Saturday.
"I think the momentum is still with India because they are ones who came back, having batted second and chasing 450 plus score. They might not have bowled Australia out but I think the momentum definitely is still with India," Gavaskar said.
"At the end of the day momentum doesn't mattter much because after the Bangalore win we thought India has the momentum but things didn't go well. So what happens on the day is important."
Gavaskar also praised Peter Handscomb and Shaun Marsh for their their gritty batting effort to bail Australia out in the game.
The duo stitched match-saving 124 runs for the fifth wicket to deny India a win.
"I think the way these two (Handscomb and marsh) batted, they denied India a win. It was good old fashioned Test match batting. It didn't mean that they were playing for a draw from the first ball of the game. It's fine when you find that you are not in a position to win then it's better to save the game and live to fight for another day. And that's exactly what the Australians have done because if Australia would have lost today, it would have been an uphill climb. Now they have an opportunity to win the series," he said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 20 2017 | 10:28 PM IST

Next Story