India's decision to decriminalise gay sex sparks debate in Singapore

Image
Press Trust of India Singapore
Last Updated : Sep 07 2018 | 4:10 PM IST

The Supreme Court's decision to decriminalise gay sex in India has sparked a debate in Singapore with the Minister for Law and Home Affairs K Shanmugam saying the society has to decide which direction it wants to go on an issue related to social values.

The Supreme Court on Thursday decriminalised part of the Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code that criminalises consensual gay sex, saying it was irrational, indefensible and manifestly arbitrary.

The apex court unanimously held that the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) community possess the same constitutional rights as other citizens of the country.

When asked about the ruling by the Indian Supreme Court, Shanmugam said: "(In Singapore) if you look at this issue, it is a deeply split society.The majority are opposed to any change to section 377A, they are opposed to removing it," Shanmugam, an Indian-origin senior minister was quoted as saying by The Straits Times newspaper.

However, he said that a "growing minority" wants to have it repealed. "The Government is in the middle".

The minister said that the subject is related to social values.

"Can you impose viewpoints on a majority when (the issue is) so closely related to social value systems?," asked Shanmugam, adding that in his personal opinion care has to be taken against criminalising lifestyles and sexual attitudes, and treating people involved as criminals.

"(But) it would be wrong for me to impose my personal views on society or as a policymaker," he said.

"So really, I think society has got to decide which direction it wants to go. And the laws will have to keep pace with changes in society and how society sees these issues," said Shanmugam.

Meanwhile, veteran Singapore diplomat Tommy Koh called for challenging section 377A following India scrapping the same British colonial-era legislation.

"I would encourage our gay community to bring a class action to challenge the constitutionality of Section 377A," the paper quoted Koh, also Singapore's Ambassasor-at-large, as saying.

Koh's comments were in response to a Facebook post by Professor Simon Chesterman, dean of the Faculty of Law at the National University of Singapore.

When a Facebook user reminded him that previous legal challenges in 2014 on the constitutionality of the law failed, Koh replied: "Try again."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 07 2018 | 4:10 PM IST

Next Story