Info on Jaya health given as per her wish: Apollo hosp to HC

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Feb 23 2017 | 6:22 PM IST
The Apollo Hospitals here informed the Madras High Court today that the photographs of late J Jayalalithaa taken at the hospital were not released to the media as per her desire.
It also said the bulletins released by it in connection with the medical treatment administered to her was in accordance with her wishes.
The hospital's response came on a PIL filed by PA Joseph seeking constitution of an enquiry commission or a fact finding committee to probe the "mysterious" death of the former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu.
When the matter came up for hearing today before the first bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Huluvadi G Ramesh and Justice R Mahadevan, counter affidavits were filed by Health Secretary J Radhakrishan and authorized signatory of Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, S M Mohankumar.
Apollo hospitals in its counter affidavit submitted that all information released by it on Jayalalithaa's health status was as per her wishes and also in the interest of public order.
It also said, as per the Indian Medical Council (Professional conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, medical practitioners cannot reveal details related to the patients' health.
In his counter affidavit, J Radhakrishnan said all the charges in the petition were based on "hearsay and conjecture and not facts".
The counter affidavit also said the hospital had obtained expert opinion from international specialist and consultant Dr Richard Beale on the treatment being given to the former AIADMK supremo.
Meanwhile, Centre's Senior Standing Counsel J Madanagopala Rao contended the petitioner had made the Prime Minister and other Central Ministries respondents in the case which was not relevant.
Only the Home Affairs Ministry was the relevant respondent, he said and requested that others be excluded from the list.
Granting two weeks to Rao for filing the counter affidavit, the bench directed him to make a mention of the respondents that were "irrelevant" to the litigation and posted the matter to March 13.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 23 2017 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story