Institutes that surveyed Marathas lacked expertise: HC told

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Feb 15 2019 | 7:45 PM IST

The petitioners opposing reservation for Marathas, Friday told the Bombay High Court that the five institutes, whose survey report formed the basis for granting quota to the community, did not possess the requisite technical expertise to carry out the survey.

The submission was made before a bench of Justices Ranjit More and Bharati Dangre by advocate Pradeep Sancheti, the lawyer for Sanjeet Shukla, one of the petitioners in the case.

As per the state's records, five institutes- Gokhale Institute, Rambhau Mhalgi Probodhini, Shivaji Academy, Sharda Academy and Gurukrupa Sanstha- were assigned the task of conducting the survey on the educational and economic backwardness of Maratha community in western Maharashtra, Konkan, Marathwada, Vidarbha and north Maharashtra.

However, advocate Sancheti Friday argued that the government had not conducted proper background checks on these institutes before assigning the task to them.

"None of these institutes had any prior experience of conducting a large-scale and important survey. Besides, three of these five institutes have political affiliations. Therefore, how could their survey reports have been relied upon by the Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission?" Sancheti argued.

His arguments, however, were vehemently opposed by the state's counsel V M Thorat, who cautioned Sancheti and other petitioners against making such insinuations.

"Are the petitioners suggesting that the Commission was biased? On what basis can they make such insinuations?" he said.

The bench has been hearing a bunch of petitions in favour of and against the state's decision to grant the Marathas in the state a 16 percent quota.

The quota was granted following a recommendation of the State Backward Class Commission.

On November 30, 2018, the Maharashtra legislature passed the bill giving 16 per cent quota to the Marathas following an intense agitation by the community.

The high court will continue hearing arguments in the matter on Monday.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 15 2019 | 7:45 PM IST

Next Story