Nepal's National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) had last month highlighted various human rights concerns during the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the human rights situation in Nepal before the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.
The NHRC's statement delivered by Commissioner Mohna Ansari talked about discriminatory citizenship provisions in the new Constitution, the continued failure to properly investigate into alleged extra-judicial killings and excessive use of force during protests in the Terai region, violations of the economic, social, and cultural rights of earthquake victims and the need for credible transitional justice for conflict victims.
On April 3, 2016, Prime Minister Oli had summoned the NHRC Chair Anup Raj Sharma and other commissioners to question them about the statement, according to a local media report.
In their joint statement today, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch (HRW) and International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) said that while it is entirely appropriate for the Prime Minister like other stakeholders, to consult with the NHRC, such exchanges should be conducted with due respect for the legitimate exercise of the institution's constitutional mandate, independently and free of undue interference or intimidation.
"The manner of questioning, including insinuations of bias and a lack of neutrality, particularly those aimed at Commissioner Ansari, the public face of the NHRC in Geneva, revealed an intent not of clarification, but intimidation that seeks to limit the role and effectiveness of the NHRC," said Champa Patel, director of the South Asia Regional Office at Amnesty International.
Reacting to the joint letter, Prime Minister's foreign affairs advisor Gopal Khanal said: "The Prime Minister is simply asking the NHRC to act more cautiously at a time when different international actors are misinterpreting Nepal's human rights situation," he said.
