Bruce Riedel, who worked in the National Security Council of the White House and was among the few present at the Bill Clinton-Nawaz Sharif meeting in 1999 during Kargil war, said the attack is designed to prevent any detente between India and Pakistan after Prime Minister Narendra Modi's surprise Christmas Day visit to Pakistan.
In an article in the Daily Beast, Riedel said the attacks in Pathankot and on the Indian Consulate in Mazar-e Sharif in northern Afghanistan was the handiwork of Pakistani terror group Jaish-e-Muhammad which the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) created 15 years ago.
He said the ISI is under the generals' command and is composed of army officers, so the spies are controlled by the Pakistani army, which justifies its large budget and nuclear weapons program by citing the Indian menace.
"Any diminution in tensions with India might risk the army's lock on its control of Pakistan's national security policy. The army continues to distinguish between 'good' terrorists like JEM and LET and 'bad' terrorists like the Pakistani Taliban, despite decades of lectures from American leaders," he said.
Riedel, a former CIA officer, said the Pakistani army has long distrusted Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who has advocated a detente with India since the 1990s.
He noted that the US put JeM on the terrorist sanctions list years ago - but it continues to coddle the Pakistani army.
(REOPENS FES 38)
Pakistani columnist Mohammad Taqi, in an op-ed in 'The Huffington Post' said that chances are slim that the powerful Pakistani Army would allow any normalisation of Indo-Pak ties.
"Chances are slim to none that Pakistan's powerful military will allow normalisation of relations with India, for it perceives such normalisation as a recipe for forgetting the Kashmir problem, which to it is the core issue and the unfinished agenda of partition," Taqi, a former columnist for The Daily Times of Pakistan, said.
Taqi said the "problem is that groups like JeM and Lashkar-e-Taiba have remain under the Pakistan army's wing for so long that the plausible deniability being invoked in that country seems abysmally farcical."
"The onus is on Pakistan to prove that it is part of the solution in Afghanistan, not the cause of the problem there -- and not a constant pain in the India side," he wrote, adding that it remains to be seen whether Pakistan will correct its course, or continue to back those who attack the Afghan parliament and Indian military and civilian installations.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
