J&K govt rules out exclusive colonies for Kashmiri Pandits

Image
Press Trust of India Srinagar
Last Updated : May 19 2016 | 10:13 PM IST
Jammu and Kashmir government today ruled out exclusive colonies for Kashmiri migrant Pandits but said it would consider any alternative plan, even from separatist groups, to rehabilitate the minoritycommunity in the Valley.
"The proposal is to make land available where everyone can live. There is no question of an exclusive colony. That is out," Government Spokesman and Minister for Education, Naeem Akhtar said here.
"Everyone, whether separatists or mainstream, is saying that Pandits must return and that they are welcome. PDP, NC, Congress and BJP - all are saying that they are a part of our society.
"But, when they are returning after 25-30 years, where will they live? They are coming back in an entirely changed scenario.
Akhtar said there has to be a "foothold where anyone can live whether a Pandit or a Kashmiri who belongs here or a even Kashmiri from outside."
"Every state subject, perhaps even Dogras of Jammu would like to live here," he said.
The Minister said if the separatist groups have any alternative to the proposal, the government would consider that.
"If you (people) have any alternative to this, you can tell us. If they - (Hurriyat leader Syed Ali Shah) Geelani, who is a votary of this, or his other colleagues, have an alternative to this, kindly tell us, we will consider, no issues.
"It is a cause dear to them as it is to us. We have placed our cards before you, you do the same," he said.
On reports of establishing a Sainik Colony for ex-servicemen, Akhtar said, "This is nothing new. It has been going on for many years but it has not reached anywhere."
"A class of people put up a demand for establishment of the colony, but no decision has been taken. But it is only the ex-servicemen from the state who have requested for land. The last report from our government on it is we do not have any land. When there is no land, how will we go ahead with it," he said.
On state subject law, Akhtar said, "there is no room for violating state subject law. State subject law is a protective umbrella and we cannot even think that it can be violated.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 19 2016 | 10:13 PM IST

Next Story