Justice P Velmurugan, before whom the cover was submitted as per his direction on an election petition, adjourned the matter to December 15 after the court was informed that the Supreme Court today stayed his order to the jail authorities and UIDAI seeking the records.
The Judge had on November 24 directed jail authorities and the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to submit the fingerprint details by today while hearing a petition by P Saravanan, DMK candidate for the November 2016 Thirupparankundram Assembly bypoll, challenging the election of AIADMK's A K Bose.
When the matter came up today, Jailor of the Parappana Agrahara Central Prison in Bengaluru Mohana Kumar produced in a sealed cover the prison register which contained the signature of Jayalalithaa.
It also contained the soft copy of Jayalalithaa's thumb impression obtained through the e-prison electronic device when she was lodged in the prison following her conviction by the trial court in the Rs 65.66 crore disproportionate assets case in September, 2014, the jailor submitted.
Kumar informed the court that normally literate convicts affix their signature in the prison register and only the illiterate puts their thumb impression. However, all the convicts' thumb impression would be recorded in the e-prison electronic device, he added.
When the judge asked him whether the soft copy was certified as per section 65 B of the Evidence Act granting authenticity to it, the Jailor said he would get the certificate.
Counsel for UIDAI Deputy Director General Y L P Rao, who was also present in the court, informed the court that there was a bar under section 29 of the Aadhar Act from disclosing bio-metric details or information about the Aadhar card holders.
At this stage, counsel for Bose informed the Judge that on a special leave petition by his client the Supreme Court has stayed the proceedings related to production of Jayalalithaa's thumb impression.
Recording the production of documents, the judge then posted the matter to December 15.
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud of the apex court stayed the high court order.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
