Karti's apprehension of arrest in INX media case in SC turns real

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 28 2018 | 4:30 PM IST
Karti Chidambaram's apprehension in the Supreme Court last week that he will be arrested on his return from London turned out to be true with the CBI taking him into custody in connection with INX media case as soon as he landed at the Chennai airport today.
Karti, son of former union minister P Chidambaram, had vehemently pleaded in the apex court for staying or postponing the Enforcement Directorate's summon issued against him for his appearance on March 1 in connection with the money laundering case of INX Media, even as the CBI had said he was "not a common criminal".
During the hearing before a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra on February 23, Karti's counsel Kapil Sibal had perhaps realised the intention of the investigating agencies and wondered whether the CBI planning to arrest his client.
"So, are you planning to arrest him," Sibal had asked the agencies.
CBI's counsel Tushar Mehta had then shot back "I am not saying that he will be arrested" but the call has to be taken by the investigating agency.
Mehta, an Additional Solicitor General, had also opposed Karti when during the hearing of the CBI case, he had sought a stay or postponement of the summons issued to him in the ED case.
The apex court was hearing the pleas of both CBI and Karti against the Madras High Court order of August 22, 2017, by which it had refrained itself from going into the merit of issue of quashing the FIR lodged in the INX Media case but rejecting the investigating agency's ground of maintainability due to lack of territorial jurisdiction.
The Madras High Court had however held that it was inclined to adopt the 'doctrine of forum of convenience' so that the parties could move the convenient court. It directed the court registry to return all the papers in the case to Karti to enable him approach the Delhi High Court, which has superintendence powers in the matter.
The apex court bench also comprising Justices Amitava Roy (since retired) and D Y Chandrachud had on February 23, adjourned the matter to March 6, while noting the submissions of Sibal and senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam, appearing for Karti, that they intended to seek time from the competent authority to appear before it.
The court had, however, made it clear that it has not dealt with the issue of maintainability of the applications moved by Karti against the ED's summon.
Karti was allowed to travel to United Kingdom and France by Madras High Court on February 16, in connection with his business activities in those countries.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 28 2018 | 4:30 PM IST

Next Story