MACT member and District Judge K D Vadane held that the two opponents - truck owner Ashok Marekar and The New India Assurance Company Ltd - were jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation.
The claimants in the case were - widow Champavati Tulsiram Bukkekar (then 30 years old), her two children Rani Tulsiram Bukkekar (6), Sarvesh Tulsiram Bukkekar (7) and mother-in-law Sundramma Maruti Bukkekar (58).
They stated that Tulsiram Maruti Bukkekar (34), hailing from Bidar district in Karnataka, worked as a cleaner with Rohit Transport Services, and earned Rs 8,000 per month, besides a daily allowance Rs 100.
The claimants alleged that the accident occurred due to sole negligence on part of the truck driver.
Considering the future prospective income of the deceased, they sought a compensation of Rs 20,16,000.
The truck owner did not appear before the tribunal, and hence the case was decided ex-parte against him.
Thus, the accident occurred due to his own negligence, the insurance firm said and requested for claim dismissal.
The judge noted that in the FIR it was specifically alleged that the deceased was sleeping near the truck. At that time the truck driver, without taking care and caution, started the vehicle, as a result of which the wheel passed over the head of the deceased. This act on the part of driver of the truck amounts negligence.
He said the Rs 11.21 lakh compensation will include Rs 8.96 lakh for future loss of dependency, Rs 1 lakh each for loss of estate and love & affection and Rs 25,000 cost incurred on the funeral and last rites of the deceased.
After hearing both the sides, the judge observed that the
spot panchnama shows the accident had occurred at a square (junction point), therefore it was expected from the rider of the motorcycle and the truck driver to take utmost care while proceeding from there.
Moreover, from the FIR, spot panchnama and postmortem report it is shown that the wheel of the truck ran over the deceased. This implicitly shows that at the time of the accident, the truck was in high speed and its driver could not control it, he further observed.
Therefore, taking into consideration all the above facts and circumstances, the accident occurred due to contributory negligence to the extent of 75 per cent on the part of truck driver and 25 per cent on the part of deceased, the judge noted in his recent order.
"While deciding, I have already come to the conclusion that the impugned accident occurred due to contributory negligence to the extent of 75 per cent on the part of driver of the container and 25 per cent contributory negligence on the part of deceased," the judge observed.
Therefore, both the opponents are jointly and severally responsible to pay 75 per cent compensation out of total amount, which comes to Rs 36,16,038, with interest at 8 per cent per annum, the judge said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
