KoPT royalty scheme struck down by H C

Image
Press Trust of India Kolkata
Last Updated : Dec 11 2015 | 7:28 PM IST
The Calcutta High Court has struck down a scheme of Kolkata Port Trust imposing royalty on the income of private handling agents at Haldia Dock Complex dealing with dry bulk cargo, holding that it has no power to impose such condition.
Justice Arijit Banerjee, after hearing petitions by some stevedoring companies challenging the new scheme, also struck down KoPT's tender condition restricting the remuneration of private handling agents, which they receive for services rendered to importers and exporters, to ceiling rates fixed by the Port.
Justice Banerjee, in his December 9 order, held both the clauses in the Port's tender relating to royalty and fixing of ceiling limit to be illegal.
The court said that the Tariff Authority for Major Ports (TAMP) constituted under Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 would have the power to frame a scheme for royalty as well as take a decision on ceiling rates for handling agents.
Government of India has framed stevedoring policy for all ports where the powers of TAMP for fixing port rates have been recognised to the exclusion of individual port authorities, the petitioners claimed.
The four writ petitions filed by Ripley, J M Baxi, A M Enterprises and Lee & Muirhed challenged the clauses of the KoPT tender which imposed royalty and ceiling rates on income in respect of such berths at Haldia Dock Complex where private handling agents render services directly to importers and exporters without involvement of the Port.
The berths which have been allotted for exclusive use of a single party on contractual basis have been kept outside the purview of the court's decision.
Anindya Kumar Mitra, senior counsel appearing with solicitors Victor Moses & Company, had argued that the scheme for royalty introduced by KoPT through a tender dated July 21, 2014 was without any authority of law.
He had also pointed out that several handling agents had obtained license at Haldia by paying fees prescribed by TAMP and no further levy could be imposed by the Port without sanction of TAMP.
The court, in its order, observed that KoPT had no power to impose any fiscal condition for granting handling agency licenses as per provisions of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 11 2015 | 7:28 PM IST

Next Story