Lavish praise from teachers harmful for pupils

Image
Press Trust of India London
Last Updated : Oct 31 2014 | 5:40 PM IST
Teachers who give struggling pupils "lavish praise" could make them even less likely to succeed, according to a new UK study.
The Sutton Trust education charity in UK has warned that many strategies used by teachers have no evidence to show that they really work.
Lavish praise for students is among seven popular teaching practices not supported by evidence, according to a Sutton Trust and Durham University report which reviewed over 200 pieces of research on how to develop great teachers.
Professor Rob Coe and colleagues at Durham's School of Education, warn that many common practices can be harmful to learning and have no grounding in research.
Examples include using praise lavishly, allowing learners to discover key ideas by themselves, grouping students by ability and presenting information to students based on their "preferred learning style".
On the other hand, some other teaching approaches are supported by good evidence of their effectiveness. Many of these are obvious and widely practised, but others are at odds with common assumptions.
Examples include: challenging students to identify the reason why an activity is taking place in the lesson; asking a large number of questions and checking the responses of all students; spacing-out study or practice on a given topic, with gaps in between for forgetting; and making students take tests or generate answers, even before they have been taught the material, researchers said.
Previous research shows that the quality of teaching is by far the biggest factor within schools that impacts the achievement of children from poorer backgrounds.
The report offers a "starter kit" for thinking about what constitutes effective teaching. This is based on behaviours, approaches and classroom practices that are well-defined, easy to implement and show good evidence of improvements in student outcomes.
According to the report, teachers with strong knowledge and understanding of their subject make a greater impact on students' learning.
It is also important for teachers to understand how students think about content and be able to identify common misconceptions on a topic.
Specific practices, like reviewing previous learning, providing model responses for students, giving adequate time for practice to embed skills securely and progressively introducing new learning (scaffolding) are also found to improve attainment, the report said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 31 2014 | 5:40 PM IST

Next Story