In an interview to PTI, CII President Shobana Kamineni said the industry is "reasonably prepared" for implementing the goods and service tax (GST) from July 1 and suggested fixing of a sunset date for cess to be levied on demerit and luxury goods.
Also, the anti-profiteering provision should not be used in a discretionary manner, she suggested.
Kamineni said the recent ordinance to resolve bad loans will give banks that have been hesitant for the past two years the confidence to lend. But for demand to pick up, the industry would need lower interest rates.
With the ordinance, right steps have been taken on the supply side, but the demand side is waiting for a trigger or a signal of lower interest rate, she pointed out.
Banks are straddled with anywhere between Rs 9 lakh crore and Rs 12 lakh crore of stressed assets - made up of bad loans, restructured debt and advances to companies that cannot meet servicing obligations.
The government earlier this month through an ordinance amended laws to give powers to the RBI to order banks to initiate insolvency proceedings against defaulters and create committees to advise them on recovering NPAs.
"We want the government to roll out GST from July 1. We are as prepared as we would be on September 1. Industry is reasonably prepared. CII is doing a series of training programme with MSMEs. The focused training programme is intended to help associations get trained on implication of GST," she said.
GST will subsume excise, service tax, VAT and other local levies and create a unified market for seamless transfer of goods and services.
The GST Council, comprising Union and state finance ministers, has decided on a four tier tax structure of 5, 12, 18 and 28 per cent. Besides, for demerit and luxury goods, a cess will be levied on top of the peak rate. The cess will be used to compensate states for any revenue loss arising out of GST implementation.
With regard to the anti-profiteering provision provided in the GST law, Kamineni said it leaves scope for ambiguity of declaring something as profiteering and since most products have MRPs, the scope for profiteering does not arise. "We are against anything that is ambiguous and discriminatory that leaves it for interpretation," she stressed.
The government is keen that benefit of lower taxes is passed on to consumers and so, an anti-profiteering measure has been woven into the GST law.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
