Maj Aditya not named in FIR, possibility of naming him as accused depends on further probe; J-K to SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 05 2018 | 9:20 PM IST
The Jammu and Kashmir government today told the Supreme Court that Major Aditya Kumar's name did not figure in the FIR lodged in connection with the January 27 Shopian firing incident, but said the inclusion of his name among the accused depends on further probe.
The state government's response that the possibility of inclusion of Major Aditya's name among the names of the accused depends on further investigation in the case prompted a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra to halt further probe in the case.
"Then we will say that no action will be taken against him till the matter is disposed of here (apex court)," the bench, also comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud said.
The order to this effect was passed after senior advocate Shekhar Naphade and advocate Shoeb Alam, appearing for the Jammu and Kashmir government, elaborated about the development in the case in which three civilians were killed.
They submitted that Major Aditya does not even figure among the names of the accused in the FIR lodged on the allegation that Army personnel opened fired in retaliation in which three persons were killed.
"He (Major Aditya) has not been named as accused in the FIR. The column of the accused in the FIR is left blank. His name also does not feature in the case diary as of now. He is just been named on the basis of allegation that he led the convoy which had opened fired on retaliation. There is no specific allegation against him," the senior advocate said, adding that the petition is infructuous.
To this, the court asked whether Major Aditya was the only person from the Army whose names featured in the narrative of FIR and does the statement of Naphade means that he will not be named as an accused in the future.
When Naphade replied that the possibility of inclusion of Major Aditya's name as accused would depend on the outcome of the investigation, the bench passed the order restraining the state government from taking any action against him.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 05 2018 | 9:20 PM IST

Next Story