Microsoft drops lawsuit as US govt limits use of gag orders

Image
AFP Washington
Last Updated : Oct 24 2017 | 6:22 PM IST
Microsoft is dropping a lawsuit against the US government after the Department of Justice issued new rules limiting the use of secrecy orders that prevent firms from telling customers law enforcement has accessed their data.
The tech giant sued the government in April last year, but declared victory yesterday and said it was ending its case after the DOJ announced it would revise its rules.
Brad Smith, Microsoft's chief legal officer, said the company had achieved "an unequivocal win for our customers" that protected the constitutional rights of US citizens.
"Until now, the government routinely sought and obtained orders requiring email providers to not tell our customers when the government takes their personal email or records," he wrote in a blog post.
"Sometimes these orders don't include a fixed end date, effectively prohibiting us forever from telling our customers that the government has obtained their data."
Smith acknowledged that secrecy orders were sometimes required for legitimate reasons -- such as protecting individuals at risk from harm or ensuring an investigation was not thwarted.
But, he added, at the time the lawsuit was filed, "the government appeared to be overusing secrecy orders in a routine fashion - even where the specific facts didn't support them".
"When we filed our case we explained that in an 18-month period, 2,576 of the legal demands we received from the U.S. government included an obligation of secrecy, and 68 per cent of these appeared to be indefinite demands for secrecy," he said.
But in a memo issued last week, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said any such gag order "should have an appropriate factual basis" and "should extend only as long as necessary to satisfy the government's interest".
While lauding the DOJ's decision, Microsoft repeated its call on US Congress to amend the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act that regulates government access to contemporary electronic communications.
It comes as the US Supreme Court last week announced it would hear a separate privacy case that pits the Trump administration against Microsoft.
The case examines whether US law enforcement should be allowed to access evidence held on servers overseas during an investigation.
It comes after Microsoft refused to hand over emails during a US drug trafficking investigation on the basis the police's warrant did not extend to Ireland, where the messages were stored.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 24 2017 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story