Miffed over summoning 90-yr-old Badal to SIT office, SAD bays for IGP's blood

Image
Press Trust of India Chandigarh
Last Updated : Nov 15 2018 | 9:55 PM IST

Opposition SAD Thursday questioned the professional competence and impartiality of IGP Kunwar Vijay Pratap Singh and sought his removal from the SIT, probing the 2015 police firings at two places in Faridkot at mobs protesting the state-wide sacrilege incidents.

The SAD questioned IGP Singh's "professional competence" for originally summoning 90-year-old former Chief Minister Prakash Singh Badal to join the SIT probe at its Amritsar Circuit House office, saying that the law mandates examination of any male witness above 65 years of age at his residence only.

Though the SIT subsequently amended its November 9 summons with another one on November 12 asking him to report to SIT at the "place of his convenience", it has failed to douse the Akalis' fury.

"In the interest of the people of Punjab having faith in the fairness and credibility of the probe, it is absolutely imperative that Kunwar Vijay Pratap Singh be removed from the SIT as its member, said SAD spokesperson Daljit Singh Cheema.

Besides former Chief Minister Badal, the five-member Special Investigation Team (SIT) has also summoned his son and former Deputy CM Sukhbir Singh Badal and actor Akshay Kumar.

While the Badal senior has been asked to appear before the SIT on November 16, the junior one has been summoned on November 19. Akshay Kumar has been asked to appear before it on November 21. All three had been originally asked to join the SIT probe at its Amritsar Circuit House office.

In a memorandum submitted to Punjab Chief secretary Thursday, the SAD demanded IGP Singh's removal from the SIT, saying the summonses issued by the police officer was against the mandate of law as section 160 of the CrPC requires that a male above 65 years of age could be examined as a witness at his place of residence and no where else."
Quoting the stipulations of section 160 of the CrPC, SAD spokesperson Cheema said in the memorandum, "This further shows the IGP's indifference to the law."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 15 2018 | 9:55 PM IST

Next Story