The mother of a Frenchman in a vegetative state for over a decade pleaded for UN help Monday to stop her son's "murder", after a court ruled his life-support could be turned off.
"They want to murder Vincent," Viviane Lambert told an event on the sidelines of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.
Vincent Lambert, 42, has been in a vegetative state since a 2008 traffic accident, but the question of whether to continue keeping him alive artificially has bitterly divided his family and the nation.
"Vincent is not at the end of his life. Vincent is not a vegetable," Lambert said, adding that she had come to the UN to seek "help".
In May, a UN committee on disabled rights, based in Geneva, asked France to keep Lambert alive while it conducted its own investigation into his fate. But the French government rejected that request as non-binding.
The case has taken the warring Lambert family to the top courts in France and Europe, with Lambert's parents, who are devout Catholics, fighting a six-year legal battle to maintain his treatment.
His wife, along with doctors, six of his siblings and a nephew had hoped Friday's decision in the "right-to-die" case would end the legal battle once and for all.
The Cour de Cassation, France's highest appeals court, ruled that the life support mechanisms keeping the severely brain-damaged man alive could be turned off "from now on".
Friday's ruling reversed a decision by another Paris court ordering that Lambert's feeding tubes be reinserted, just hours after doctors began switching off life support following a previous court ruling.
The Cour de Cassation did not consider the arguments for or against keeping Lambert alive, but only the question of whether the lower court was competent to rule on the case.
In Friday's decision, it found that the appeal court was not competent in a ruling that is final.
The case has rekindled a charged debate over France's right-to-die laws, which allow so-called "passive" euthanasia for severely ill or injured patients with no chance of recovery.
Condemning the French government's position that the UN committee's request was non-binding, Jean Paillot, one of the parents' lawyers, told Monday's event: "This is absolutely scandalous and clearly justifies our presence here today."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
