Mother refuses surgery, conjoined twins discharged

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Aug 24 2016 | 3:13 PM IST
The conjoined twins, who were under observation at a civic hospital here for three weeks after their birth last month, have been discharged as their mother continued to oppose and raise apprehensions about their survival if they undergo a separation surgery.
The babies were discharged on Saturday after doctors attending on them felt they were doing "fine".
However, in the backdrop of the family's resistance to the surgery anytime soon, they have been advised to visit the hospital as and when the babies needed attention, a senior doctor said.
"We had to discharge the babies because their mother Shaheen denied to give her consent for the operation despite our level best to persuade her. She feared losing them and preferred to see both of them alive," Paras Kothari, Head of paediatric unit at Sion Hospital, said today.
"But before the discharge, we ensured that the babies were doing fine and completed all possible medical observations," he said.
Also, all the expenses for the treatment of the babies as well as the mother after the delivery were borne by the hospital administration.
"At the time of discharge, we also gave an oxygen cylinder on our behalf for the babies and have advised them to visit the hospital in case of any unusual activity/behaviour on part of the babies," added Dr Kothari.
Last week, 26-year-old Shaheen denied permission to separate her babies, who share a common heart, thorax, abdomen, stomach and pelvic region.
The twins were born on July 27, weighing 3.6 kgs. The mother had discovered they were conjoined in her 32nd week of pregnancy, when she underwent the first sonography test since conceiving them.
The babies have a very complex internal architecture as they have two separate heads and necks, but a partially common thorax, and are completely fused below the umbilicus level.
Earlier, Dean, Suleman Merchant had formed an ethical
committee to scrutinise the case and all the possibilities of the separation of the baby through surgical procedure. He said the hospital did not insist on the operation as they needed to respect the family's decision.
"When the mother is not ready for the operation, the committee has no role to play in this," Kothari said, adding that if his team would have gone ahead with the surgery, only one child would have survived.
"They have a complex anatomy which even we do not understand. If a separation surgery could have been conducted, we could have understood their internal organs clearly. Their survival is now God's wish," the paediatrician added.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 24 2016 | 3:13 PM IST

Next Story