MP HC summons official to explain plan on juvenile boards

Image
Press Trust of India Jabalpur
Last Updated : Mar 13 2015 | 9:22 PM IST
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has summoned the state's Principal Secretary of the Women and Child Welfare Department on March 24 to explain the action plan to do away with shortcomings plaguing juvenile justice boards functioning in different districts.
However, the court granted liberty to the Principal Secretary saying "if he has any other important commitments, he must depute some senior official capable of explaining the action plan of the MP government to the court".
Dissatisfied with the government counsel's reply on the issue yesterday, a division bench of the High Court, comprising Chief Justice A M Khanwilkar and Justice Ajit Singh, had expressed concern over functioning of the boards which lack infrastructure, including staff.
"Staff deployment to boards which have already been established is very unsatisfactory, if not appalling," the court observed, while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Rekha Shridhar, co-ordinator of a Bhopal-based non-governmental organisation (NGO) called Hifazat, which works for children's rights.
"We hope that the Principal Secretary of the Women and Child Welfare Department would immediately address shortcomings in the respective boards, especially deficiency of staff deployed to the boards," the court said.
Under the Right To Information Act provisions, the petitioner had sought information on a number of cases pending before juvenile justice boards across the state.
The PIL sought directions from the court to district judges in the light of the Supreme Court directives issued in the Sheela Barse vs Union Government and others case (1986) as well as Sanat Kumar Sinha vs State of MP (1989) case for speedy trial of pending cases in MP's juvenile justice boards.
Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, enables a maximum period of sending juveniles to a special home for three years while many cases have been pending before MP's juvenile justice boards for more than five years, the petitioner's counsel Abhinav Jain said.
The petitioner's counsel said that initially when the petition was filed in 2013, the number of cases pending before MP's juvenile justice boards were Betul (342 cases), Jhabua (163 cases), Chattarpur (127 cases), Shahdol (464 cases), Narsinghpur (95 cases), Khandwa (74 cases), Gwalior (774 cases) and Seoni (101 cases).
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 13 2015 | 9:22 PM IST

Next Story