Nagpur cops file six new cases in Gosikhurd scam

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Feb 20 2018 | 7:25 PM IST
Nagpur Police today registered six new offences in alleged Gosikhurd irrigation scam which pertains to irregularities in the tender process of the project, official said.
Around 14 offences have been registered in connection with the scam in Nagpur till date, an official said.
Investigating agency Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) today approached the police and lodged a complaint against officials and contractors, a senior police official said.
Gosikhurd project falls under the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC).
During the open enquiry into the scam, the ACB found major irregularities and lapses in tender process as well as involvement of then engineers, divisional accounts officers of the department, contractors and their partners, he said.
The cost of the tenders was illegally inflated by the government officials to favour specific contractors and their partners, he said.
Officials of the VIDC allowed some contractors to participate in tendering process though they were ineligible, the official said, adding that successful contractors submitted forged experience certificates to obtain the work order for the project.
The contractors, who participated in the tender process with a joint venture firm, got payment in personal accounts, he said.
During investigation it came to light that the government officials concerned and contractors were part of a criminal conspiracy which resulted into the scam, he said.
Earlier eight offences were registered in connection with the Gosikhurd irrigation project. In two cases, chargesheets were filed in a special court of ACB in Nagpur, he added.
GosiKhurd Irrigation Project is one of the major irrigation projects in Godavari basin in Maharashtra's Bhandara district on the river Wainganga.
The irrigation project was approved in March 1983 at an estimated cost of Rs 372.22 crore and was expected to be completed by March 1990. However, it remains incomplete even after 33 years after the approvals were granted. It is alleged that the project costs have escalated manifold over a period of time.
A report of the Public Accounts Committee had noted that even after 33 long years (post approval) and spending thousands of crores, the purpose of commissioning the project was not realised.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 20 2018 | 7:25 PM IST

Next Story