It said the money was returned when the facts came to light about the organization.
"Modi government is running its usual diabolical agenda to slander, malign and defame through Goebbelsian lies meted out by Home Ministry in shape of mischievous and selective news plants.
"To top this venal conspiracy of muckraking, Modi government and BJP fielded Union Cabinet Minister, Ravi Shankar Prasad," party's chief spokesman Randeep Surjewala said in a statement.
"Truth is that Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust (RGCT) received a donation in conformity with law and norms and same was returned by the Trust out of its volition in view of the controversy surrounding Islamic Research Foundation/Zakir Naik.," he said.
Targeting the Modi government, he said it must stop its "web of vengeful deceit and lies."
"Despite the extremities of vindictive malintent, they will never be able to cloud the truth", Surjewala said.
in the case were that in 2011, the Rajiv Gandhi Charitable Trust received "one single unsolicited stray donation of Rs 50 lakh" from Islamic Research Foundation which was directly deposited in the RGCT account by IRF through cheque.
The donation was followed up by IRF with a donation letter informing the RGCT that the money was to be used for its "general fund" and PAN card details were enclosed in accordance with law. "IRF did not inform RGCT that this donation was in any way connected to FCRA," he said.
In early July, 2016, when the IRF/Zakir Naik controversy became public, RGCT took a decision and refunded this money to IRF. RGCT also took a decision that after the refund of this "single stray donation", it will have no engagement of any type with IRF, Surjewala said.
Singhvi accused the government and the BJP of launching a "virulent, baseless" propaganda against the Congress and it showed the "mental bankruptcy" of the ruling dispensation.
Taking a dig at the BJP, he wondered as to how Congress could be an "astrologer" knowing about the controversial past of the IRF when the donation was accepted.
He also wondered as to why the Modi government did not ban the IRF since coming to power two years back.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
