The country's economic experience shows that the fiscal activism embraced by advanced economies -- giving a greater role to counter-cyclical policies and attaching less weight to curbing debt -- is not relevant for India, said the pre-Budget document.
It said the country's fiscal experience has underscored the fundamental validity of the fiscal policy principles enshrined in the FRBM Act, 2003.
It added however that even as the basic tenets of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) remain valid, the operational framework designed in 2003 will need to be modified "for the fiscal policy direction of India of today, and even more importantly the India of tomorrow".
Since the 2008-09 Global Financial Crisis (GFC), fiscal policy internationally has seen a paradigm shift from the emphasis on debts to deficits, arguing for greater activism in flows (deficits) and minimising concerns about sustainability of the stocks (debt), the survey said.
"But India's experience has reaffirmed the need for rules to contain fiscal deficits, because of the proclivity to spend during booms and undertake stimulus during downturns," it added.
The Survey's observations assume significance as N K Singh -headed panel last week submitted its four-volume report on modifying the FRBM Act to Jaitley.
The five-member panel was tasked to review the FRBM Act in view of suggestions that there should be a broad range for government's fiscal deficit in place of the current practice of having a fixed target.
While announcing the intention of the government to set up a committee to examine the FRBM Act, Jaitley in his Budget speech in February last year had said "there is a school of thought which believes that instead of fixed numbers as fiscal deficit targets, it may be better to have a fiscal deficit range as the target, which would give necessary policy space to the government to deal with dynamic situations".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
