Raising questions about what constitutes privacy, he said can a bureaucrat deny information on jewellery purchased by his wife under the shield of privacy of the lady.
Similarly, he said, can a politician fighting elections use the privacy garb to deny information about family wealth.
Also Read
"I believe these three are examples, these are not conclusive. They are only illustrative," he said, adding that steps taken by the government to augment revenue realisation cannot be restricted in the name of privacy.
The Supreme Court in its verdict last week held right to privacy as a fundamental right.
"For two decades we lived in era of transparency and court judgements were also in that direction. Now privacy has been added to transparency and hence keeping personal things secret has become a fundamental right," Jaitley said at a lecture on transparency in political funding here.
He said the big issue that will emerge now is how to balance transparency and privacy. "Is there a contradiction (between the two)?... So the balancing, reconciliation between the two is necessary."
Jaitley said if some person says that he will spend Rs 1 crore in cash but that the government has no right to know about it as it violates his privacy, then you are being dishonest to the country.
"You keep violating the tax laws in the name of privacy ... So transparency and sharing information becomes important in the interest of revenue generation," he said.
With regard to political funding, Jaitley said he had announced electoral bonds scheme to cleanse the system. "We are trying to finalise that," he said.
In a major move aimed at promoting transparency in political funding, the Finance Minister had in this year's Budget speech announced capping of anonymous cash donations to political parties at Rs 2,000 and introduced electoral bonds.
As per the electoral bond mechanism announced in the Budget, the proposed bonds will resemble a promissory note and not an interest-paying debt instrument. They will be sold by authorised banks and can be deposited in notified accounts of political parties within the duration of their validity.
The bonds will not carry the name of the donor and routing of the money through banks will ensure that only tax paid money comes into the political system.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)