No toll exemption for vehicles on Mumbai-Pune Expressway: Maha to HC

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Sep 11 2018 | 8:10 PM IST

The Maharashtra government informed the Bombay High Court Tuesday that it had decided against exempting vehicles using the Mumbai-Pune Expressway from paying a toll.

In an affidavit filed through the Public Works Department (PWD), the government informed the court while it had initially contemplated exempting light motor vehicles from paying levy at five toll plazas along the expressway, it had decided against granting any exemptions for now.

The state told a bench led by Justice R M Savant that it had considered factors like the flow of traffic, number of vehicles using the expressway each day and its financial resources, and decided that all vehicles will have to pay toll at the plazas along the expressway at least till April 2030.

The submissions were made by the government in compliance with a previous order of the high court.

In July this year, the high court had asked the state to decide whether toll plazas on the expressway were to be scrapped since IRB Infrastructure Developers, the contractor in-charge of the 90km corridor, has already collected Rs 145 crore more than the anticipated amount through toll collection.

The court was hearing a plea seeking that the right of the contractor to collect toll along the expressway be revoked.

The plea, a public interest litigation (PIL), has been filed by four petitioners, including activist Pravin Wategaonkar.

It claims the contractor has already recovered the cost of the project as per its agreement with the state authorities and yet, continues to collect toll, thus making a "wrongful gain".

The plea claims that earlier last year, the chief minister had announced that 12 toll plazas across the state would be closed.

The PIL also claimed that the state had promised to exempt light motor vehicles from paying toll on 53 toll plazas across Maharashtra from June 1 2015, but the state had failed to take a final decision on the same.

The state, however, informed the bench the contractor (IRB Infra) had neither made any wrongful gains nor had it breached any terms of the contract with the government.

The high court is likely to conduct further hearing in the matter on September 27.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 11 2018 | 8:10 PM IST

Next Story